Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Madigan
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1975No. Civ. 36073PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARKEET, J. *
This appeal involves a primary issue whether the trial court correctly ruled that the execution statutes of this state in conjunc tion with the homestead laws are unconstitutional in that they establish a statutory scheme which deprives homeowners of rights guaranteed them by both the California and United States Constitutions. Also at issue is whether legislation establishing a new statutory scheme satisfies constitutional requirements!
The facts in the case are undisputed, the issues being wholly legal in nature. A statement of facts essential to an understanding of the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Clausing v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Helena Rubenstein Internat. v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Leger v. Stockton Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Cynthia McCahey v. L.P. Investors, Allen M. Rosenthal, Affiliated Credit Adjusters, Sheriff of Suffolk County, Suffolk County ClerkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Diaz v. Kosmala (In Re Diaz)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.