Legal Opinion

Farulla v. Freundlich, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.

The plaintiff labor union, which is the only union in the doll and toy industry in the city of New York, had an industrial dispute with the employers in their industry. A strike was imminent. The contending parties were called together by the New York Regional Labor Board, an agency created under the National Industrial Recovery Administration.

On March 1, 1934, the labor union and about seventy-five per cent of the manufacturers in the industry, including this defendant, signed an instrument to submit certain of the matters in dispute “ to arbitration.” The instrument states: “ It is further…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schlesinger v. QuintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Dubinsky v. Blue Dale Dress Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Farulla v. Ralph A. Freundlich, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API