Legal Opinion
Farulla v. Ralph A. Freundlich, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The main contentions of the parties to this case were set out in the opinion handed down on December 1, 1934 (153 Misc. 738). In that opinion the court held that there was nothing in section 7-a of the National Industrial Recovery Act (U. S. Code, tit. 15, § 707, subsection [a]) that prevented the making or carrying out of the award for a closed shop rendered under the agreement entered into with the New York Regional Board. This award and the contract it embodies plaintiff here seeks to enforce. This “ agreement ” sets out that the “ form of arbitration should be determined by the Regional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of EnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Armour v. GaffeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Hays v. HaysNew York Supreme Court · 1840
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938