Legal Opinion

Dubinsky v. Blue Dale Dress Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCook, J.

In February, 1936, the Popular Priced Dress Manufacturers Group, Inc., an association of employers (hereinafter called the association), made a collective agreement with the plaintiffs’ international and joint board, the latter representing five local unions. This contract was to run for nearly three years and purported to make effective a desire for co-operation in establishing ■ for the industry a living wage and fair and reasonable conditions of labor and to provide methods for fair and peaceful adjustment of disputes so as to secure uninterrupted operation and general stabilization. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. QuintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Farulla v. Freundlich, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Schlesinger v. QuintoNew York Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  5. Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Associated Milk Dealers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API