Legal Opinion

Norton v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1917No. S. F. No. 8328PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. A. Beasly, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment against it and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The" action was upon the bond of a notary public executed by defendant as a surety for the faithful performance of official duty by the said notary public, one Frank L. Dreischmeyer.

It appears from the evidence that Dreischmeyer was not only a notary public, but that he also acted as an agent in matters relating to property and that he was a practitioner at the bar. In November, 1909, plaintiff delivered to Dreischmeyer six hundred dollars to be used in making an investment for her in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. County of Calaveras v. PoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. LindholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  3. Griffith v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Torrealba v. KesmetisNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hellwig v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API