Legal Opinion
Warner-Lambert Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 13, 2005No. 2004-1534PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
The issue is the validity of the reclassification by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) of imported Vitamin C supplement drops from their previous duty-free status as “medicaments” to dutiable status as “sugar confectionery.” The Court of International Trade upheld the reclassification, and we affirm.
I
A. As the Court of International Trade stated, the imported merchandise is lozenges sold in packages under the name “Halls Defense™ Vitamin C Supplement Drops.” Warner-Lambert Co. v. United States, 341 F.Supp.2d 1272, 1273-74 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2004).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Drygel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Honda of America Mfg., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.