Bixenmann v. H. Kehm Construction
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.
NATURE OF CASE
This appeal arises from an order of affirmance on review by the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court review panel. The review panel affirmed the decision of the trial court which denied Ryan Bixenmann temporary total disability (TTD) benefits during vocational rehabilitation and also denied waiting-time penalties, attorney fees, and interest. In this appeal, we must resolve an apparent inconsistency between Workers’ Comp. Ct. R. of Proc. 36 (2002) and the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Act as to whether Bixenmann is entitled to an award of TTD benefits retroactive to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Rodriguez v. Monfort, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Kerkman v. Weidner Williams Roofing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Swanson v. Park Place AutomotiveNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Stansbury v. HEP, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Armstrong v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Stacy v. GREAT LAKES AGRI MARKETING, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Sweeney v. Kerstens & Lee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Ortiz v. Cement Products, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Davis v. Crete Carrier Corp.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.