Sweeney v. Kerstens & Lee, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
NATURE OF CASE
The plaintiff, Robert Sweeney, was injured in an accident that arose out of and was in the course of his employment, and was awarded workers’ compensation benefits. Sweeney became clinically depressed, however, after his vocational rehabilitation counselor concluded that Sweeney’s loss of earning capacity was only 55 to 60 percent. The question presented in this appeal is whether Sweeney’s depression, which resulted from a disappointing vocational rehabilitation report, was proximately caused by Sweeney’s original accident.
BACKGROUND
Sweeney was injured in 1997 in an accident…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Ryan v. Workman's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Cardenas v. Peterson Bean Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Colorado Organ Recovery System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Hynes v. Good Samaritan Hosp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Parks v. Hy-VeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Stacy v. GREAT LAKES AGRI MARKETING, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Manchester v. DRIVERS MANAGEMENT, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.