Stansbury v. HEP, INC.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court entered judgment directing the defendant-appellee employer, HEP, Inc., to pay the plaintiff-appellant employee, Carl Stansbury, in addition to the compensation benefits it had already paid him or on his behalf, benefits for a 10-percent loss of earning capacity and for a 12-week period of vocational rehabilitation. Claiming that he was entitled to greater benefits, as more particularly set forth in part IV(2) below, Stansbury appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, which in part affirmed and in part reversed the judgment of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. MancusiSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Long v. HackerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Smith v. Fremont Contract Carriers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Beatrice Manor, Inc. v. Department of HealthNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Oviatt v. Archbishop Bergan Mercy HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Berggren v. Grand Island Accessories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Owen v. American Hydraulics, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Cheloha v. ChelohaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Variano v. Dial Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Johnson v. Holdrege Medical ClinicNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.