Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. HEP, INC.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1995No. S-94-813PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court entered judgment directing the defendant-appellee employer, HEP, Inc., to pay the plaintiff-appellant employee, Carl Stansbury, in addition to the compensation benefits it had already paid him or on his behalf, benefits for a 10-percent loss of earning capacity and for a 12-week period of vocational rehabilitation. Claiming that he was entitled to greater benefits, as more particularly set forth in part IV(2) below, Stansbury appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, which in part affirmed and in part reversed the judgment of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. MancusiSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Long v. HackerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Smith v. Fremont Contract Carriers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Beatrice Manor, Inc. v. Department of HealthNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Oviatt v. Archbishop Bergan Mercy HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Berggren v. Grand Island Accessories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Owen v. American Hydraulics, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cheloha v. ChelohaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Variano v. Dial Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Johnson v. Holdrege Medical ClinicNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API