Legal Opinion
Kerkman v. Weidner Williams Roofing Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1996No. S-95-921PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
Rodney A. Kerkman appeals an order of dismissal entered by the Workers’ Compensation Court. The court found that certain chiropractic treatments received by Kerkman were not reasonable or necessary as a result of 1987 work-related injuries, and it therefore dismissed his petition requesting payment of these expenses by the employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier. Finding sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the Workers’ Compensation Court’s conclusion, we affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In 1987, Rodney A. Kerkman was injured in two separate automobile accidents while…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Paulsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Spiker v. John Day Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- Hull v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Aken v. Nebraska Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- US West Communications, Inc. v. TaborskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Winn v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- McBee v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Armstrong v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Rodriguez v. Hirschbach Motor LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.