Bond v. Aickley
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against W. C. Aickley and others to quiet her title to a parcel of land in the city of Oakland. Pending the action, W. 0. Aickley executed a deed of the premises to Irving E. Smith. Thereafter Aickley died, and Ruth Aickley, as administratrix of his estate, was substituted in his stead as a party defendant. Smith also appeared as a defendant, and answered, denying plaintiff’s claim of ownership of the premises. Of the remaining defendants, some disclaimed, and the action was dismissed as to the others.
The court found that plaintiff was not the owner, or in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lawrence v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Union Lumber Co. v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Zilmer v. GerichtenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Leonard v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Scott v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Westside Apartments, LLC v. Butler (In Re Butler)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2002
- City of Burlingame v. NorbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Di Giorgio v. Lee (In Re Di Giorgio)District Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Hanson v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.