Legal Opinion

Sloss v. Greenberger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1959No. Appeal, No. 109PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Plaintiffs’ motion to take off a nonsuit was dismissed, and from the Judgment of nonsuit plaintiffs have appealed. It is, of course, hornbook law that plaintiff must be given the benefit of every fact and every reasonable inference of fact arising from the evidence, and all conflicts therein, must be resolved in his favor: Seburn v. Luzerne and Carbon County Motor Transit Co., 394 Pa. 577, 148 A. 2d 534; Finnin v. Neubert, 378 Pa. 40, 105 A. 2d 77; Lewis v. Quinn, 376 Pa. 109, 101 A. 2d 382.

Reviewing the testimony in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. QuinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Finnin v. NeubertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Bailey v. Alexander Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Bartek v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Seburn v. Luzerne & Carbon County Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Winkler v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Atkins v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH., ETC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Borsa v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Stenson v. RechuttiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API