Legal Opinion

Stenson v. Rechutti

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1965No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit.

Plaintiff brought a trespass action against Dome-nick Rechutti, the owner of Dorn’s Normandy Market, a corner grocery store, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when she bumped her leg on a basket in the defendant’s grocery store.

In Repyneck v. Tarantino, 415 Pa. 92, 202 A. 2d 105, the Court said (pages 93-94) : “In Markle v. Robert Hall Clothes, 411 Pa. 282, 191 A. 2d 374, the Court quoting from Flagiello v. Crilly, 409 Pa. 389, 187 A. 2d 289, said (page 284) : ‘ “It is hornbook law that a judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Flagiello v. CrillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Schofield v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Repyneck v. TarantinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Stimac v. BarkeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Borzik v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Dougherty v. Boyertown TimesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Watkins v. Sharon Aerie No. 327 Fraternal Order of EaglesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Borsa v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Arcidiacono v. Timeless Towns of the Americas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API