Legal Opinion

Bartek v. Grossman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1947No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This is an action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries incurred by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendants. The original defendants, Sadie L. Grossman and Ida Hoffenberg, were owners of a vacant store at the corner of Fifth Avenue and Court Place in the City of Pittsburgh. They authorized the United States Realty Company to find a tenant.

On or about March 10, 1943, plaintiff, a prospective tenant, made inquiry at the office of the United States Realty Company, and this company sent its agent with him to inspect the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Bailey v. Alexander Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Hoffner Et Ux. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. McVeagh v. BassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Hellriegel v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. McDevitt v. Terminal Warehouse Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Just v. Sons of Italy HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Johnson v. RulonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Mogren Et Ux. v. GadonasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. McNally v. LiebowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API