Legal Opinion
Brunda v. Home Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 30, 1986No. 174 and 175PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
This is a consolidated appeal from orders of the trial court which revoked class certifications previously entered in Brunda v. Home Insurance Co., No. 1141-S-1984 (Dauphin Cty.) and Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North America, No. 995-S-1984 (Dauphin Cty.). These actions had sought recovery of post-mortem work loss benefits under Pennsylvania’s No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act. 1 The representative plaintiffs in both cases also appealed from judgments dismissing their individual claims on grounds that they were barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
Francis J.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- In Re HOTEL TELEPHONE CHARGESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,524 Carl Mintz and Shirley Mintz v. Mathers Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gabovitz v. State Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Jones v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Cunningham v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Magee v. JG Wentworth & Company, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Cunningham v. INS. CO. OF NORTH AMER.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.