Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,524 Carl Mintz and Shirley Mintz v. Mathers Fund, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 15, 1972No. 71-1506PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUERGENS, District Judge.

On January 2, 1970, plaintiffs Mintzes (Mintzes) brought suit on their own behalf and representatively on behalf of all others who purchased shares of capital stock of Mathers Fund, Inc., between March 18 and April 2, 1969 — the latter being the class purportedly represented by the Mintzes. Jurisdiction is founded on the Securities Act, alleging various violations of that Act. By order dated August 28, 1970, leave was granted to Alexander E. Wallace to intervene as a plaintiff in the action and leave was granted to Mintzes to add the individual defendants as parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Kansas City, Mo. v. Williams Williams v. Kansas City, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  3. Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Beard v. Whitley County REMCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Alfred MECHNIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Michael Lauritzen and Marilyn Lauritzen, Individually and Doing Business as Lauritzen FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. David B. WEIHAUPT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API