Legal Opinion
In Re HOTEL TELEPHONE CHARGES
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1974No. 73-1107PublishedCited by 135 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ELY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is from an Order allowing the appellees’ consolidated actions to be maintained as a class action under Rule 23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Permission to appeal the interlocutory Order was granted pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1292(b).
The first action in this case was filed in the Central District of California, and shortly thereafter, ten similar actions were filed in nine other districts. The Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation ordered the consolidation of all the actions in the Central District of California. The complaints allege a nationwide…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- In Re Visa Check/mastermoney Antitrust Litigation. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Limited, Inc., Sears Roebuck & Company, Safeway Inc., Circuit City Stores, Inc., National Retail Federation and the Food Marketing Institute, International Mass Retail Association, and All Similarly Situated Persons v. Visa U.S.A. Inc. And Mastercard International IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.