United States v. Bennett
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1ConcurrenceKastl, Senior Judge
What matters are relevant and admissible during the presentencing phase of an Air Force court-martial, given the new, expansive language of AFR 111-1? This court-martial, decided under the amended regulation, provides an opportunity to review several useful lessons from similar situations in the past.
Expansion of AFR 111-1
The presentencing materials in this case (letters of reprimand and notification of a demotion action) were admitted under paragraph 13-4 of AFR 111-1, Military Justice Guide (30 September 1988). That authority permits admission of “all those records made or maintained in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. MontgomeryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. WarrenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. BoldenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. KlineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. NewbillU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.