Legal Opinion

United States v. Bolden

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 19, 1983No. ACM S25863PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

RAICHLE, Judge:

The accused pled and was found guilty of four specifications alleging transfer and possession of hashish and marijuana, in violation of Article 134, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. § 934. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months and reduction to airman basic. The accused assigns three errors for our consideration; 1) the military judge erred in admitting evidence of an over-aged nonjudicial punishment; 2) the specifications alleging possession of marijuana and possession of hashish are multiplicious for purposes of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. John Paul WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. Virgil v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. United States v. ClevidenceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. DeJongeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. KeithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. LucasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. BrentonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. CumbeeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API