Legal Opinion

United States v. Newbill

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 20, 1977No. ACM S24506PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*542DECISION

BUEHLER, Senior Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas, the accused was convicted by a special court-martial, of five offenses of forgery and one offense of unauthorized absence in violation of Articles 123 and 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 923, 886. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months, forfeiture of $150.00 per month for six months and reduction to airman basic.1

Appellate defense counsel have assigned five errors, four of which were also alleged in the accused’s request for appellate representation. We find…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MontgomeryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  2. United States v. HinoteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  3. United States v. LewisU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. BolesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. MercierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. BaughmanU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. SherwoodU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. ClarkeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API