Legal Opinion

Browning v. Brunt

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 27, 2018No. SC 20010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKahn, J.

**449The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the trust beneficiaries are the proper parties to bring an action against third parties on behalf of the trust. The plaintiffs-Ann Browning, Richard Browning, Lance Browning, Karen Guinta, and Jill Milligan-are beneficiaries of a trust, and appeal1 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their breach of contract claim against the defendants Dougherty & Company, LLC (Dougherty), the financial advisor for the trust, and Thomas Olander, an employee of Dougherty.2 Although the parties agree that the *1126general rule is that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kizis v. Morse Diesel International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Wilcox v. Webster Insurance, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Palmer v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. Preston v. PrestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Naier v. BeckensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duso v. GrotonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  2. Estate of CalvinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. In re Estate of MouchagueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  4. State Marshal Assn. of Connecticut, Inc. v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  5. Rodowicz v. Feldman, Perlstein & Greene, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API