Legal Opinion

Purkiser v. Fogler

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1936No. Civ. 1536PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The parties hereto are sister and brother. After the death of their mother the plaintiff recorded deeds purporting to convey the mother’s property to her. This defendant and another brother started proceedings to establish their right to a two-thirds interest in the properties conveyed. A compromise was effected and on November 23, 1928, the three children of the deceased executed an agreement which provided that the two brothers would discontinue their contest, that the sister,would convey the south half of a certain forty-acre tract of land to the two brothers, that she would convey the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bingham v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Elm v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Fogler v. PurkiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Havens v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API