Legal Opinion

Lifton v. Harshman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1949No. Civ. 16437Published

1Opinion of the Court

90 Cal.App.2d 180 (1949)

SAM LIFTON, Appellant,

v.

HARRY T. HARSHMAN et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 16437.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Feb. 16, 1949.

George I. Devor, Newmark & Hamblin and Norman Newmark for Appellant.

Stephen Monteleone and W. Torrence Stockman for Respondents.

MOORE, P. J.

This is the second appeal in an action for specific performance of a contract to convey real property.

Respondents having refused to consummate their agreement to sell an apartment house to appellant, he instituted this action for specific performance. An adverse judgment was reversed upon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Abbott v. the 76 Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Heinlen v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  4. County of San Mateo v. BartoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Coleman v. DawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API