Legal Opinion

Havens v. County of Alameda

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1916No. Civ. No. 1658PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. Wm. H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

Section 1*4 of article XIII of the constitution of California provides that “All buildings, and so much of the real property on which they are situated as may be required for the convenient use and occupation of said buildings, when the same are used solely and exclusively for religious worship, shall be free from taxation; provided, that no building so used which may be rented for religious purposes and rent received by the owner therefor shall be exempt from taxation.'”

The plaintiff in this action sought to recover the sum of $1,683.60 paid under protest to the tax collector of the county…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Krakow v. WilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Nearing v. CoopNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Deputy v. MooneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Olson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Merrill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  2. Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Norton v. RosenkranzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Purkiser v. FoglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Epletveit v. SolbergMontana Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API