Legal Opinion

In Re Ronnie A.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 11, 2003No. 25696PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

At age eleven, appellant was adjudicated delinquent for committing first degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor (CSCM). He was nine years old at the time of the offense. Appellant contends the family court’s order requiring him to register as a sex offender violates due process. We affirm.

DISCUSSION

Under S.C.Code Ann. § 23-3-430(0(4) (Supp.2002), appellant is required to register as a sex offender because of his adjudication for first degree CSCM. This section applies to “any person regardless of age ... who has been adjudicated delinquent” for certain sex offenses. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Treatment & Care of LuckabaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. In re M.A.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. State v. WallsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Hendrix v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In the Interest of Justin B.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. People in the Interest of J.O.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. In the Interest of Justin B.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  5. People ex rel. Z.B.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API