Legal Opinion
In the Interest of Justin B.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 28, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2010-151466; No. 27306PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
Justin B. (Appellant), a minor under seventeen years of age, challenges the active electronic monitoring (electronic monitoring) requirements of section 23-3-540 of the South Carolina Code. Section 23-3-540 requires that individuals convicted of certain sex-related offenses, including criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the first degree (CSC-First), submit to electronic monitoring for the duration of the time the individual is required to remain on the sex offender registry. S.C.Code Ann. § 23-3-540(A)-(H) (Supp.2012). An individual *394found guilty of CSC-First is required to register as a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Petersen-BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- In the Interest of Justin B.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- in Interest of T.BColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. NationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.