Legal Opinion

State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2013No. 52477PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*496OPINION

By the Court,

Douglas, J.:

In this original writ proceeding, we consider whether Assembly Bill 579, enacted by the 2007 Nevada Legislature, providing for the retroactive application of mandatory sex offender registration and community notification requirements on juveniles adjudicated for certain sex offenses, violates the Due Process and Ex Post Facto Clauses of the United States and Nevada Constitutions. We conclude that registration and community notification do not violate the Due Process or Ex Post Facto Clauses. We therefore grant the petition.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Real party…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Shaw v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. In the Interest of T.H., Minor ChildSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  3. Alex Jordan Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State of Iowa v. Lloyd AschbrennerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  5. In re D.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API