Legal Opinion
In the Interest of Justin B.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 3, 2017No. Appellate Case No. 2015-000992; Opinion No. 27716PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE FEW:
Justin B., a minor, was found delinquent for committing criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the first degree. The family court imposed the mandatory, statutory requirement that he register as a sex offender and wear an electronic monitor, both for life. Justin B. claims the mandatory imposition of lifetime registration and electronic monitoring on juveniles is unconstitutional. We affirm the family court.
I. Facts and Procedural History
In April 2013, Justin B. was charged with criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the first degree under subsection 16-3-655(A)(l) of the South…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. WallsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- In Re Ronnie A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, IN the INTEREST OF T.B., Respondent/Cross-PetitionerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- State v. RossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- in Interest of T.BColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Christopher H.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
- In the Interest of T.H., Minor ChildSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.