Legal Opinion
In re M.A.H.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 15, 2000No. 2-99-048-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
2Per curiam
We grant M.A.H.’s motion for rehearing. We withdraw our April 20, 2000 opinion and judgment and substitute the following.
After a hearing before the court, the trial court found that M.A.H., a juvenile, engaged in delinquent conduct by committing two instances of indecency with a child. As a result, M.A.H. was required to register as a sex offender pursuant to the Texas Sex Offender Registration Program under chapter 62 of the code of criminal procedure. See Tex. Code CRIM. PROC. Ann. art. 62.01(5)(H) (Vernon Supp.2000). On appeal, M.A.H. complains the Sex Offender…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by33 opinions
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Dean v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- In Re Ronnie A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.