Legal Opinion

Metchem, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 14, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-105; Court 04-00238PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court following trial. Plaintiff MetChem, Inc. (“Met-Chem”) challenges the classification for tariff purposes of its imported product. The United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) classified the imported product as nickel carbonate under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) subheading 2836.99.50. 1 Plaintiff asserts that the proper classification is under subheading 7501.20.00, i.e., nickel oxide sinters and other intermediate products of nickel metallurgy. 2

JURISDICTION AND STANDARD OF REVIEW

Th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. North American Processing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Pillowtex Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MetChem, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. Citizen Watch Co. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  4. Degussa Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  5. Millenium Lumber Distribution Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API