Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 1931No. 28,265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting judgment- notwithstanding a verdict of $7,500 in favor of the plaintiff for damages due to the dea,th of her husband while employed as a section hand on defendant’s railroad.

Plaintiff was riding upon a motor car used by a section crew to which he did not belong. He got on the car at the conclusion of work for the day for the purpose of riding about 800 feet to a point near his home. Above and around the engine in this car was built a housing which formed a convenient level seat about 20 inches above the platform…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Nealis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Jewell v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yates v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Muckler v. BuchlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. O'Connor v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Vardolos v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API