Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1936No. 30,831PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $18,000 against defendant in her action for damages founded upon the claim that she became afflicted with pulmonary tuberculosis while employed in one of its mills in Minneapolis, the basis for liability being the alleged violation of 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, §§ 4172, 4173, 4174, and 4176. These sections relate to heating and ventilating places of employment. Defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding was granted. Judgment was thereupon entered, and plaintiff appeals.

Her employment with defendant commenced in September, 1927.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bucher v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kirsher v. KirsherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Hall v. RankinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Ingwersen v. CarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Phillips v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hiber v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Aasen v. AasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Albert Lea Ice & Fuel Co. v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Wenner v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Zappa v. Charles Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API