Legal Opinion

Vardolos v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1933No. Nos. 29,133, 29,134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Defendant appeals from the orders denying its motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or new trial.

Two cases were brought against defendant, one by the father in behalf of his minor son for injuries to him, and one by the father for damages to his automobile used by the son when he was injured. The two actions were tried together and verdicts returned in favor of both plaintiffs. We shall hereinafter refer only to the son’s case, calling him plaintiff.

Defendant is a corporation, and on November 2, 1929, was operating a gasolene filling station on the corner of Tenth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nealis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Robertson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Phillips v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Langford Electric Co. v. Employees Mutual Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Bauer v. Miller Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API