Legal Opinion
Yates v. Gamble
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 1936No. 30,806PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. M. Olsen, Justice.
Chrystal J. Yates brought this action to recover damages alleged to have been caused to her by malpractice on the part of defendants, J. W. Gamble and Paul Gamble, physicians and surgeons, in performing surgical operations on her body and in treating her in connection therewith. There was a directed verdict for defendants. Chrystal J. Yates died on September 10, 1935, after the trial and pending her motion for a new trial. Thereafter Sybil Yates, as special administratrix of decedent’s estate, was substituted as plaintiff. The motion for a new trial was denied, and the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Hestbeck v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. ChattertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- City of Eveleth v. RubleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Hanson v. Big Stone Therapies, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.