Legal Opinion

Carrier v. Hicks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1993No. CC 87-2112; CA A60563; SC S37366PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*343PETERSON, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant tavern operators, in a civil action to recover for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. Defendants allegedly served alcoholic beverages to Morgan, the driver of a car that struck plaintiffs vehicle, injuring him. Defendants’ insurer became insolvent, and the Oregon Insurance Guaranty Association (OIGA) defended defendants against plaintiff s claim. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The Court of Appeals reversed. Carrier v. Hicks, 102 Or App 13, 793 P2d 329 (1990). We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Molodyh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mazorol v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Carrier v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Barackman v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Robinson v. GailnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Bird v. Norpac Foods, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. HAYS GROUP, INC. v. BiegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Bonds v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API