Bonds v. Farmers Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*154WALTERS, J.
In this case, we decide that, to “formally institute arbitration,” and thereby satisfy the timelines set forth in ORS 742.504(12)(a)(B) and maintain a claim for under-insured motorist (UIM) benefits, an insured or an insurer must expressly communicate to the other party that the initiating party is beginning the process of arbitrating a dispute. We further decide that two letters written by defendant to plaintiff in this case did not meet that standard and that plaintiffs claim for UIM benefits is therefore time-barred.
On July 2, 2003, plaintiff was injured in an automobile…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Molodyh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Carrier v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Liles v. Damon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Paton v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Luka v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Bonds v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Bonds v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.