Bird v. Norpac Foods, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The dispositive issue presented in these two consolidated appeals, under the Oregon Insurance Guaranty Association (OIGA) statutes, ORS 734.510 et seq, is as follows: When OIGA has assumed all of the rights, duties, and obligations of an insolvent insurer pursuant to ORS 734.570, and a plaintiff obtains a personal injury judgment against a defendant insured by that insolvent insurer, must the judgment be deemed satisfied to the extent that the plaintiff has received workers’ compensation benefits from a solvent insurer for the same injury? The Court of Appeals answered that question in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Carrier v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Reinan v. Pacific Motor Trucking CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Starr v. HeckathorneOregon Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vasquez v. Double Press Mfg., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
- New Hampshire Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Pitco Frialator, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- Wade v. MahlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Ob/Gyn Associates v. New Hampshire Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Leitch v. Mississippi Insurance Guaranty Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.