Legal Opinion

Carrier v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 30, 1990No. 87-2112; CA A60563PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendants, arguing that the arbitration award between him and his insurer did not preclude an action against defendants, the tortfeasors. We reverse.

The facts are not disputed. Plaintiff was injured in a car accident. The driver of the other vehicle, Morgan, had liability coverage of $50,000 that was divided among the injured parties, with plaintiff receiving $23,000. Plaintiff then made a claim with his own insurer, Farmers Insurance Company, under his underinsured motorist coverage, which was up to $250,000. Plaintiff and Farmers arbitrated, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaul v. TourtellotteOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Savelich Logging Company v. Preston Mill CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Mazorol v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carrier v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Carrier v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Carrier v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API