Legal Opinion

Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension Fund v. Koman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 18, 1956No. 17,824PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

We will refer to the parties by name or as they appeared in the trial court, where John Koman was plaintiff and the Board of Trustees of the Policemen’s Pension Fund, et al., herein also referred to as the Board, were defendants.

On August 15, 1942, plaintiff was appointed a member of the Pueblo police department, and he continued in that employment until May 3, 1948, when he resigned by letter dated May 1, 1948. On May 6, 1954, plaintiff by letter claimed a pension on account of physical disability allegedly incurred in the performance of his duties as a Pueblo policeman. The next day he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Van DeVegt v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  3. Matter of Doering v. HinrichsNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Clemens v. KernIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Barney v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Pueblo Firemen's Pension FundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  2. City of Aurora v. HoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Kinsey v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF POLICEMEN'S PEN. FUND v. KomanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API