Legal Opinion
City of Aurora v. Hood
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 26, 1977No. 27404PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle
Respondent David L. Wilhelm (“Wilhelm”), a former member of the Aurora Police Department, made application for permanent disability to the respondent Board of Trustees of the Aurora City Police Retirement System (“Board”). On March 18, 1976, the Board granted a permanent disability pension to Wilhelm. The City of Aurora (“City”) initiated this action by filing a petition with the district court pursuant to C.R.C.P. 106 alleging that the Board had exceeded its jurisdiction and had acted arbitrarily and capriciously in awarding the pension to Wilhelm. On March 26, 1976, the district court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Police Pension & Relief Board v. McPhailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- People Ex Rel. VanMeveren v. COUNTY COURT, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Police Pension & Relief Board v. BillsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Hubbard v. Pueblo Firemen's Pension FundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colorado Springs Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 5 v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Cadnetix Corp. v. City of BoulderColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Bonacci v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- City of Lincoln v. SoukupNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Bonacci v. City of AuroraColorado Court of Appeals · 1979