Legal Opinion

Kinsey v. Adkins

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1973No. 13406PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Berry, Chief Justice:

This original proceeding in mandamus was instituted by J. W. Kinsey, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, against B. W. Adkins, B. H. Cassell, R. L. Bonar, Chauncey H. Browning, Jr. and John H. Kelly, as members of the West Virginia Department of Public Safety Retirement' Board, hereinafter referred to as respondents, to compel them to retire petitioner from active service with the West Virginia Department of Public Safety and to award him total disability benefits in accordance with the provisions of the death, disability and retirement fund which the respondents…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Dunlap v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. United States ex rel. Dunlap v. Black, Commissioner of PensionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Spencer v. YeraceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Rudolph v. United States ex rel. RockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. HackelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Wagoner v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re Anderson's Application for Disability BenefitsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API