Legal Opinion
Matter of Doering v. Hinrichs
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 1942PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lehman, Ch. J.
On April 14, 1941, the Council of the City of New Rochelle adopted an ordinance purporting to abolish the position, which the petitioner then held, of “ Clerk in Central Garage in the Department of Public Works.” The petitioner was notified that his services would not be required after April 30, 1941. George F. Mohr was retained in the service of the Department of Public Works in the position of clerk. The Civil Service Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 7), section 31, provides that any person whose position in the competitive class under civil service law or rules “ is abolished or made…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Marcus v. IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
3Cited by24 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Fox v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension or Relief FundWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- Matter of Hines v. La GuardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Girard v. Board of Education of City School District of City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Lindsey v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.