Legal Opinion

JONATHAN JAMES PRICE, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 2016No. SD34063PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, J;,'

Jonathan James Price (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because:Movant’s trial-counsel failed to investigate the testimony of two potential witnesses Movant claimed would have provided a viable defense to the charge against Movant. Because Movant’s amended motion was- not timely filed and the motion court did -not' undertake an independent inquiry into whether Movant had been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  2. John Childers v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Lawrence Frazee v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. CRAIG A. HILL, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Hougardy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. BRETT ALLEN YELTON, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. ERIC JERONE WILLIAMS, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API