CRAIG A. HILL, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNancy Steffen Rahmeyer,J.
—Opinion Author
Craig A. Hill (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial without an evi-dentiary hearing of his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035, Missouri Court Rules (2016). In a single point relied on, Movant asserts that the motion court “clearly erred in denying [Movant] an evidentiary hearing” on his claim that plea counsel “was ineffective for failing to request a mental evaluation” of Movant. Movant and the State now agree that Mov-ant’s amended motion for post-conviction relief was filed after the time permitted by Rule 24.035(g), and request that the case be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- JONATHAN JAMES PRICE, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
3Cited by2 opinions
- BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- ERIC JERONE WILLIAMS, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016