Legal Opinion

BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 2020No. SD36451Published

1Opinion of the Court

BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, ) ) Movant-Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. SD36451 ) Filed: October 29, 2020 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent-Respondent. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUNKLIN COUNTY Honorable Joe Z. Satterfield, Judge AFFIRMED Billie J. Borschnack (“Borschnack”), appeals from the motion court’s denial of Rule 29.151 relief. In one point on appeal, Borschnack argues that the motion court clearly erred in finding that “appointed counsel” did not abandon Borschnack, and that retained counsel’s subsequent amended motion was untimely. Finding no merit to this point, we affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API