Warehime v. Schweitzer
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Yakey, J., entered November 29, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action of replevin, tried before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.
— This action was brought for recovery of the possession of a horse and of a set of double harness. *300The value of the horse is fixed in the complaint at $350, and that of the harness at $50. The right of the plaintiff to recover possession was disputed, and the cause was tried by the court below without a jury, resulting in a judgment that the plaintiff shall recover the possession of the horse, or its value, fixed at $275; also, the sum of $90 as the value of the use of the horse by the defendant. The judgment also provides for the recovery of the harness, or its value, fixed at $50. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Horrell v. California, Oregon & Washington Homebuilders' Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Smith v. GlennWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Bringgold v. BringgoldWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Lilly v. EklundWashington Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sallaske v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Nye v. ManleyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Granite Falls State Bank v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State Ex Rel. City of Okmulgee v. MoroneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932