Bringgold v. Bringgold
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spo- „ kane county, Honorable A. G. Kellam, Judge pro tempore, entered June 30, 1904, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury,- granting a divorce.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
This is an action for divorce, in which the wife is plaintiff. A decree of divorce was entered in her favor, and a disposition of property was made. Defendant has appealed. Despondent has moved to strike the statement of facts upon the ground that it is not indexed in accordance with rule 3 of this court. The statement contains one thousand three hundred and sixty-one pages of type- ■ written matter. A number of witnesses were examined and some were frequently recalled, but there is no index showing who testified, or upon what ones of the numerous pages the testimony of any single -witness…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lilly v. EklundWashington Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by12 opinions
- Northern Life Insurance v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Fender v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Kitsap County Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Smith v. GlennWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Berens v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.