Legal Opinion

Williams v. Kirkman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 8, 1950No. 381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStaoy, C. J.

The question for decision is whether the evidence making for plaintiff’s cause survives the demurrer, carries the case to the jury and suffices to support the verdict. The trial court answered in the affirmative and we approve.

The evidence readily permits an inference of excessive speed and reckless driving on the part of the defendant. This was in violation of law and calls for a jury verdict, unless the plaintiff’s own evidence establishes his contributory negligence as a matter of law. The trial court was of opinion that it did not and that the issue was one for the twelve. We agree.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Shell v. . RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Barlow v. City Bus Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Ferguson Ex Rel. Ferguson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Journigan v. Little River Ice Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Sanders v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Hall v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  4. Hall v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API