Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stagy, O. J.

The correctness of the ruling on the statute of limitations turns on the validity of the credits entered by plaintiff on the notes in suit 12 January, 1938. This was a matter for the jury under proper instructions from the court. Lee v. Manley, 154 N.C. 244, 70 S.E. 385; Miller v. Womble, 122 N.C. 135, 29 S.E. 102; Young v. Alford, 118 N.C. 215, 23 S.E. 973.

The contention that the whole of the compromise settlement should first be used to repay the money loaned with interest before any part of the settlement could be applied to the real estate notes would seem to overlook the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brafford v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Young v. . AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Layden v. . LaydenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Lee v. . ManleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Smith v. . McGregorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Ray Charles Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Arnold v. Ray Charles Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Pemberton v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Pemberton v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API