Legal Opinion
Clare v. Palmer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 25, 1949No. 33181PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
The petition alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff is now and has been operating a drugstore in Fort Gibson since April 9, 1946, on which date he purchased the stock and fixtures of said drugstore together with the good will of the business from the defendants; that on said date a contract was entered into with the defendants as evidenced by a certain written instrument signed by the defendant Mc-Elroy Palmer, also known as Mack Palmer, for and on behalf of himself and the defendant Kathleen Palmer, his wife.
A copy of the instrument is attached to the petition. It is styled “Bill of Sale”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gregory v. SpiekerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Brown v. KlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Wesley v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Wall v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Ragsdale v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- BERRY AND BERRY ACQUISITIONS v. BFN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Oliver v. Omnicare, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Brown v. StoughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.